MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381325922 · doi:10.24043/001c.81226

Island Studies Journal 4(1), Book Reviews

2009· article· en· W4381325922 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Studies Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousContext (archaeology)GeographyFrontierEthnologyHistoryPoliticsNatural resourceGenealogyPolitical scienceArchaeologyEcologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some but not all the locations covered by the book are islands, and the introduction frames the quite disparate studies in the context of an oceanic region (like Braudel's Mediterranean, or the Atlantic) rather than 'island studies'.It cites Paul D'Arcy and the late Epeli Hau'ofa as proponents of the view that oceans link as well as isolate islands.It is as much about the Pacific Rim as the Pacific Islands.Of the islands, the text only looks closely at two.The first is Kaho'olawe, which was subject to an extraordinary series of environmental changes, brought about by indigenous people, waves of settler commercial interests (cattle, sheep and goats), and then restoration as part of an indigenous renaissance in Hawaii.The second is Guam, where the focus is on a series of environmental disputes.There are side references to the Philippines, Okinawa and Samoa.The Aleutian Islands are discussed more generally in the context of Alaskan resource politics and conservation.The focus is on the United States, and its impact, against a background historical idea of the expanding frontier, leading to conflicts with indigenous people, and a rising consciousness of the natural world that was being lost in the process.That natural world was recovered, domesticated, in suburbanization such as that which the author describes around San Francisco and Seattle.The author repeatedly emphasizes the impact of World War Two, and the resulting US victory, as a key driver of change in the region, which is as true of the South Pacific as it is of the North.The 'postwar' framing is shown most painfully in his discussion of urban planning in Hiroshima after the atomic bomb, and pervasively in his discussion of the role of the US Navy in protecting its institutional turf on Kaho'olawe (which was used as a firing range), and running Guam 'as if it were a ship'.The book shows the mixed blessings that the US has brought to these territories.There was exploitation of natural resources, such as commercial fishing and oil in Alaska, but also the growth of federal government concern with environmental conservation in the creation of national parks, and requirements for environmental impact assessments (the latter providing much of the primary data for Blackford's history).The US absorbed many of the peoples of the region as immigrants, or migrant workers.The US Navy had an ambiguous relationship with indigenous people: taking land, and arguing through the courts to defend its interests; but also insulating other land and indigenous people from some commercial

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsland Studies JournalSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207