MRI Markers of Degenerative Disc Disease in Young Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Evidence has emerged for an association between degenerative disc disease (DDD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The purpose of the current study is to determine the presence and extent of cervical DDD in young patients (age <35) with MS, an age cohort that is less well studied for these changes. Methods: Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients aged <35 referred from the local MS clinic who were MRI scanned between May 2005 and November 2014. 80 patients (51 female and 29 male) with MS of any type ranging between 16 and 32 years of age (average 26) were included. Images were reviewed by 3 raters and assessed for presence and extent of DDD, as well as cord signal abnormalities. Interrater agreement was assessed using Kendall’s W and Fleiss’ Kappa statistics. Results: Substantial to very good interrater agreement was observed using our novel DDD grading scale. At least some degree of DDD was found in over 91% of patients. The majority scored mild (grade 1, 30-49%) to moderate (grade 2, 39-51%) degenerative changes. Cord signal abnormality was seen in 56-63%. Cord signal abnormality, when present, occurred exclusively at degenerative disc levels in only 10-15%, significantly lower than other distributions ( P < .001 for all pairwise comparisons). Conclusions: MS patients demonstrate unexpected cervical DDD even at a young age. Future study is warranted to investigate the underlying etiology, such as altered biomechanics. Furthermore, cord lesions were found to occur independently of DDD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".