Prolonged Transient Global Amnesia: Part of the Clinical Spectrum or a Separate Disease Entity?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Transient global amnesia (TGA) is the prototypical neurologic disease for acute-onset reversible amnesia. It is currently defined by resolution of symptoms within 24-hours. In this case report we describe an atypical case of prolonged TGA, emphasizing our current lack of knowledge surrounding this disease entity and its pathophysiology. Results: A 66-year old female presented acutely with profound anterograde amnesia and variable retrograde amnesia with no inciting event. A thorough workup to exclude alternative causes of amnesia (including computed tomography angiogram and electroencephalogram) was normal. Her magnetic resonance imaging was consistent with TGA, with punctate diffusion restriction changes bilaterally in the hippocampi. She was also mildly hypoxemic with no discernible cause. She was ultimately diagnosed with TGA although her diagnosis remains controversial as her symptoms persisted for 72-hours. Conclusion: Our patients clinical and imaging features (apart from her protracted time-course and hypoxemia) were in keeping with a diagnosis of TGA. The association of hypoxemia, COVID-19, obstructive sleep apnea, and the development of TGA remains to be elucidated. Although the underlying pathophysiology for TGA is unknown several mechanisms have been postulated including cortical spreading depression and reversible hypoxic-ischemic injury. The time course for symptom resolution, could be an important clue in discerning the pathophysiology of TGA on an individual basis. Importantly, a clinician should not be deterred by amnestic symptoms lasting >24-hours, if the patients clinical/radiologic presentation is consistent with TGA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".