23-OR: Reduction in Insulin Uncovers a Novel Effect of VEGFB on Cardiac Substrate Utilization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
VEGFB is known to up-regulate FA delivery through its effect on EC FA transporters. In its absence, intracellular lipid accumulation was reduced. Paradoxically, cardiac-specific overexpression of VEGFB demonstrated a lowered heparin-releasable lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity with reduced FA utilization in vivo. Currently, the mechanism behind this in vivo metabolic effect of VEGFB on cardiac LPL is unclear. In transgenic (Tg) hearts, the vectorial transfer of LPL from myocytes to the vascular lumen is obstructed, resulting in LPL buildup within cardiomyocytes. Given that insulin is known to inhibit LPL translocation and thus FA metabolism in the heart, this observation is likely a secondary effect of VEGFB on vascular development with its associated augmentation of insulin delivery. We tested whether lowering of insulin by fasting would validate our hypothesis. WT fasted hearts enhanced their heparin-releasable LPL activity in an attempt to switch substrate utilization to FA. Intriguingly, this increase in LPL activity following fasting was even more dramatic in Tg hearts. Thus, with insulin deficiency following fasting, VEGFB works unimpeded to facilitate LPL movement. This effect occurred through the activation of p38 MAPK. PET imaging using 18FTHA revealed augmented LPL-derived FA and impaired FDG glucose uptake in the Tg fasted heart. Additionally, this increased delivery of LPL-derived FA correlated to augmented mitochondrial oxidation determined by high resolution oxygraphy. We examined whether this property of VEGFB on FA uptake and oxidation could be useful following diabetes, with its attendant loss of metabolic flexibility. Unexpectedly, in Tg hearts, diabetes inhibited myocyte VEGFB gene expression and protein secretion together with its downstream receptor signaling. Our data suggests that following diabetes, loss of VEGFB action may contribute towards the metabolic inflexibility, lipotoxicity and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Disclosure R.Shang: None. C.Lee: None. B.Hussein: None. B.Rodrigues: None. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT180558); Diabetes Canada (OG3215585BR)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".