MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381377587 · doi:10.2337/db23-219-or

219-OR: Glucagon Counterregulation in a Hypoglycemic Clamp in Type 1 Diabetes Is Increased by ZT-01, a Novel Somatostatin Receptor 2 Antagonist—A Phase 1b Study

2023· article· en· W4381377587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander Abitbol, Susan H. Peers, Eric Simonson, Michael Midmer, MICHAEL RIDDELL, RICHARD LIGGINS

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucagonHypoglycemiaInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyCrossover studyPlaceboGlucose clamp techniqueDiabetes mellitusInsulinType 1 diabetesType 2 diabetesPancreatic hormoneInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the effect of ZT-01 on glucagon counterregulation during hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes, in a Phase 1b randomized, three-arm, double-blind crossover trial in 23 hypoglycemia aware adults with T1D. Participants underwent three hypoglycemic clamp procedures with 3 or 20 mg ZT-01 or placebo dosed 1 h prior to stepwise glucose clamp conditions using variable rate IV insulin infusion: euglycemia (5.0 ± 0.5 mmol/L), level 1 (3.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L, L1), and level 2 hypoglycemia (2.6 ± 0.2 mmol/L, L2). With ZT-01, peak glucagon increased by up to 15.1 ± 10.5 and 27.1 ± 17.3 pg/mL, in L1 and L2 hypoglycemia, respectively, compared with no increase in L1 and an 8.4 ± 8.4 pg/mL increase in L2 hypoglycemia with placebo (p<0.0001, figure). A counterregulatory response of increased glucose level coinciding with an increased glucagon level was observed more frequently with ZT-01 than placebo. No clinically significant effects on other counterregulatory hormones or hypoglycemia symptom scores were observed with ZT-01. A transient rise in glucagon and blood glucose was observed with ZT-01 post-dose prior to hypoglycemia. No SAEs were reported and no TEAEs were observed with ZT-01. This study demonstrates proof-of-concept that ZT-01 significantly enhances the defective counterregulatory response in people with T1D during L1 and L2 hypoglycemia. Disclosure A.Abitbol: Advisory Panel; Abbott Diabetes, Lilly Diabetes, Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Lilly Diabetes, Zucara Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Moderna, Inc., Senseonics, Speaker's Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Lilly Diabetes, Amgen Canada, Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., HLS Therapeutics Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Sanofi. S.Peers: Employee; Zucara Therapeutics. E.Simonson: None. M.Midmer: Board Member; Zucara Therapeutics, Employee; Zucara Therapeutics, Stock/Shareholder; Zucara Therapeutics. M.Riddell: Advisory Panel; Zealand Pharma A/S, Zucara Therapeutics, Indigo Diabetes, Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Jaeb Center for Health Research, Speaker's Bureau; Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Stock/Shareholder; Supersapiens, Zucara Therapeutics. R.Liggins: Employee; Zucara Therapeutics, Stock/Shareholder; Zucara Therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207