MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381378391 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25030

Influence of the longest ethylene and isotactic propylene sequences on crystallization elution fractionation of ethylene/propylene copolymers

2023· article· en· W4381378391 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Voradon Voraruth, Siripon Anantawaraskul, Saeid Mehdiabadi, João B. P. Soares

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystallization and Solubility Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersKasetsart University
KeywordsCopolymerTacticityEthyleneCrystallizationEthylene propylene rubberMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryFractionationElutionDissolutionOlefin fiberPolymerOrganic chemistryChemistryPolymerizationChromatographyCatalysisComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Crystallization elution fractionation (CEF) is the newest crystallization‐based technique for estimating the chemical composition distribution of ethylene/1‐olefin copolymers. Understanding the separation mechanism of CEF for ethylene/propylene copolymers over their full compositional range is challenging because the crystallizabilities of the copolymer chains depend on the longest ethylene sequence and on longest isotactic propylene sequence. We developed a mathematical model to describe the CEF mechanism for ethylene/propylene copolymers over the entire compositional range using population balances for the crystallization and dissolution stages. The joint distribution of longest ethylene and isotactic propylene sequences determines how the copolymer populations crystallize and dissolve. The model was validated with experimental CEF profiles of ethylene/propylene copolymers varying from pure ethylene to propylene homopolymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCrystallization and Solubility StudiesFrench-language works237,207