MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381433099 · doi:10.1016/j.ostima.2023.100142

A THREE-DIMENSIONAL STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL TO DESCRIBE CLINICAL SHAPE VARIATION OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR IN PATIENTS WITH LEGG-CALVÉ-PERTHES DISEASE DEFORMITY

2023· article· en· W4381433099 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa G. Johnson, Joseph D. Mozingo, Penny R. Atkins, Siegfried A. Schwab, Antony Morris, Shireen Elhabian, D.R. Wilson, Harry K.W. Kim, Andrew E. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoarthritis Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegg-Calve-Perthes diseaseMedicineRadiographyDeformityOrthodonticsCoronal planeFemoral headNuclear medicineRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease (LCPD) is a pediatric hip condition that affects approximately 1 in 10,000 children. In LCPD the femoral head is deformed by osteonecrosis, often resulting in a permanent residual hip deformity. Residual LCPD is associated with at least a 20 times greater risk of early-onset OA in affected hips, even in patients with only mild radiographic deformity. Current routine assessment using 2D radiographic imaging does not adequately describe the complex 3D pathomorphology of LCPD. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) provides an objective and compact description of 3D shape variability, which may be used to better describe patient specific LCPD deformity and identify which features lead to early OA. 1) Construct and evaluate a compact and accurate shape model of LCPDs pathomorphology using open-source SSM software. 2) Examine the relationship between 3D LCPD pathomorphology and corresponding clinical radiographic measurements. MR images (N=13 hips, 11 patients, 3 F/8 M) of affected hips were obtained in a previous study from patients with LCPD (age range: 6-12 years, stage II-IV). Imaging was performed using a GE 1.5T HDxt scanner (Waukesha, WI) with a coronal 3D FSPGR sequence: TR=8.9 ms, TE 2.8ms, flip angle 10°, 1.0mm slice thickness, 288 × 288 matrix. For this study, MR volumes were resampled isotropically to the smallest voxel dimension (.47 - .63 mm), and two raters manually segmented the proximal femurs. The ShapeWorks SSM software (SCI Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) was used to produce an SSM with 512 particles using an incremental optimization routine. Shapes were aligned and scaled with generalized Procrustes analysis. Modes of shape variation were quantified using principal component analysis. The SSM's generalizability to unfamiliar shapes was evaluated with a leave-one-out cross-validation analysis. The relationship between neck-shaft angle, articulo-trochanteric distance and femoral head asphericity with principal component scores was examined with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ). The first four shape modes, describing 87.5% of the population variability, were selected to form a compact shape model. With these modes, the generalizability (point-to-point reconstruction error) was <1 mm. Notable associations were observed between mode IV and femoral head asphericity (ρ = 0.79), modes II and IV with neck-shaft angle (ρ = -0.43, 0.63 respectively), and modes I and II with articulo-trochanteric distance (ρ = 0.58, -0.63 respectively). This SSM provides a compact and accurate representation of 3D shape variation in LCPD. Limitations to this model include a small sample size, but nonetheless it generalizes well to unfamiliar LCPD examples. The robust and repeatable methodology will allow the model to be supplemented with additional shapes in future. With this SSM, we aim to evaluate how well clinical metrics based on 2D projections of anatomy can represent the anatomical changes that may lead to OA, and to determine why some patients with little to no radiographic deformity still develop early-onset OA. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Funding reference #165956 L.G. Johnson is supported by Arthritis Society Canada. CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsteoarthritis ImagingSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207