Association between First Trimester Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and NO2 and Congenital Heart Defects: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 1,342,198 Live Births in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The extent to which ambient air pollution contributes to the pathogenesis of congenital heart defects remains uncertain. Objective: We investigated whether first trimester exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was associated with the risk of critical and noncritical heart defects in a large population-based cohort of births. Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of children conceived between 2000 and 2016 in Quebec, Canada. Heart defects were identified via data from the Maintenance and Use of Data for the Study of Hospital Clientele registry. The main exposures were average concentration of PM2.5 and NO2 in a) the first trimester and b) the month of conception. Exposures were estimated at the residential postal code. Associations with critical and noncritical heart defects were assessed using logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal and infant characteristics. We considered single- and two-pollutant models and assessed modifying effects of maternal comorbidity, including preexisting hypertension, preeclampsia, anemia, and diabetes. Results: The cohort comprised 1,342,198 newborns, including 12,715 with heart defects. Exposure in the first trimester and month of conception yielded similar results; both were associated with a greater risk of heart defects. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for any heart defect per interquartile range increase were 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) for PM2.5 and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.13) for NO2. Associations with atrial septal defects were 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.14) for PM2.5 and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.25) for NO2. Corresponding ORs for ventricular septal defects and individual critical heart defects were not significant. PM2.5 (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.17) and NO2 (OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.31) exposure were associated with a greater risk of heart defects in mothers with comorbidity. Discussion: In this population-based cohort, prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of heart defects, particularly atrial septal defects. The association with heart defects was greater in mothers with comorbidity. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11120
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".