A comprehensive immunoinformatics study to explore and characterize potential vaccine constructs against Ole e 9 allergen of <i>Olea europaea</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy, which affects more than 30% of the population, is the most prevalent hypersensitivity illness. In an atopic individual, even a small amount of allergen exposure can cause IgE antibodies to be produced. Due to the engagement of receptors that are highly selective for IgE, even tiny amounts of allergens can induce massive inflammation. This study focuses on the exploration and characterization of the allergen potential of Olea europaea allergen (Ole e 9) affecting the population in Saudi Arabia. A systematic computational approach was performed to identify potential epitopes of allergens and complementary determining regions of IgE. In support, physiochemical characterization and secondary structure analysis unravel the structural conformations of allergens and active sites. Epitope prediction uses a pool of computational algorithms to identify plausible epitopes. Furthermore, the vaccine construct was assessed for its binding efficiency using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies, which led to strong and stable interactions. This is because IgE is known to play a role in allergic responses, which facilitate host cell activation for an immune response. Overall, the immunoinformatics analysis advocates that the proposed vaccine candidate is safe and immunogenic and therefore can be pushed as a lead for in vitro and in vivo investigations.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".