Synthesis and antioxidant activity evaluation of some new 4-thiomethyl functionalised 1,3-thiazoles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 4-bromomethyl-substituted thiazolium salts and corresponding thiazoles obtained through the condensation of 1,3-dibromoacetone with thioamide derivatives were utilised as efficient alkylating reagents for a series of thiophenols and heterylthiols. As a result, a small library of 4-thiomethyl-functionalised 1,3-thiazoles was synthesised in high yields, and their structures were characterised by 1H, 13C NMR, LC-MS and IR spectra. Antioxidant activity of obtained compounds was studied in vitro using the DPPH test. The synthesised compounds showed high absorption level of DPPH radicals in the 70-98% range. For the most active derivatives 7e,m,p,t IC50 values were determined, which were in the range 191-417 µM (for ascorbic acid (reference) IC50 value was 29 µM). Obtained radical scavenging activity screening data suggest in-depth study of the antioxidant potential for these types of heterocyclic compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".