MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381546967 · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101648

Zircon within chromitite requires revision of the tectonic history of the Eoarchean Itsaq Gneiss complex, Greenland

2023· article· en· W4381546967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Frontiers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCarlsbergfondet
KeywordsHadeanZirconGeologyGeochemistryArcheanChromititeGneissFelsicCrustal recyclingIgneous rockEarly EarthMantle (geology)Continental crustPetrologyMaficOphiolitePaleontologyTectonicsMetamorphic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ujaragssuit Nunât layered (UNL) unit in the Itsaq Gneiss Complex, west Greenland, has been considered to contain one of the oldest chromitites on Earth based on ∼ ca. 4.1 Ga Hadean whole rock Pt–Os model ages and ca. 3.81 Ga zircon U-Pb age of the surrounding orthogneiss. This study obtained zircon from the chromitite within this unit as well as granitoid sheets that intruded into the UNL unit. In–situ U–Pb–Hf–O isotope measurements were made on the zircons. Zircons from both the chromitite and the intrusive granitoids show concordant U–Pb ages of ca. 2.97–2.95 Ga. In contrast, Hf and O isotopic analyses indicate that zircons in the chromitites have a different origin from those in the intrusive granitoids. Zircons from granitoids yielded Th/U ratios higher than 0.2, initial Hf isotope ratios of 0.2805 – 0.2807 (i.e., initial εHf value of − 11 to − 5), and δ18O values of mostly 6.0‰–7.0‰, which are typical for felsic igneous rocks in Archean continental crust. The least altered zircons from a chromitite exhibited initial Hf isotope ratios of 0.28078 – 0.28084 (i.e., initial εHf value of − 1.1 to − 0.4), close the chondritic value at ca. 3.0 Ga and the depleted mantle at ca. 3.2 Ga. These zircons also have δ18O values of 4.2‰–6.1‰ which correspond to typical mantle values. The other chromitite zircons yielded Th/U ratios lower than 0.1, and Hf and O isotopic compositions ranging between the least altered zircons and the intrusive granitoid zircons. These results indicate that the zircons in the chromitites crystallized before or during the 2.97–2.95 Ga granitoid intrusion and most of the zircons were altered by subsequent metasomatism. Furthermore, the present results suggest that zircons in the chromitites originally had depleted Hf isotopic compositions at ca. 3.2–3.0 Ga. This can be explained by two different models of the evolution of the UNL unit. One is that if the UNL unit was formed at > 3.81 Ga as previously thought, with the zircons in the chromitites subsequently being precipitated by ca. 3.2–2.95 Ga during metamorphism or metasomatism. The other model is that the UNL unit itself was actually formed at ca. 3.2–3.0 Ga, with zircon in the chromitite representing the crystallisation age of the unit, which was then tectonically incorporated into the ca. 3.81 Ga orthogneiss prior to the 2.97–2.95 Ga granitoid intrusion event. In either case, our zircon analyses reveal significant evolutionary history prior to depleted mantle Hf model ages of 3.2–2.95 Ga. Revision of the geotectonic evolution of the UNL unit and the Itsaq Gneiss Complex is therefore required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it