MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381569451 · doi:10.3389/fmats.2023.1218835

Editorial: Nuclear materials degradation

2023· editorial· en· W4381569451 on OpenAlexaff
Hongliang Ming, Zhiming Zhang, Jian Chen, James J. Noël

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Materials · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegradation (telecommunications)Materials scienceComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear energy is regarded as one of the most efficient ways to reduce global carbon emissions, especially in China, which has made a promise to the world. Safety is the prerequisite in the development of a nuclear power plant (NPP). However, during the operation of an NPP, degradation of materials occurs and severely threatens the safety of the operation. As a result, to ensure the long-term safety of an NPP, it is of great importance to understand the degradation behavior of key materials, which is essential for nuclear safety management and indispensable for life prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0100.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MaterialsSame topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207