Clinical Efficacy of Salvia Polyphenolic Acid in the Recovery of Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess the clinical efficacy of salvia polyphenolic acid in the recovery of ischemic stroke. This randomized controlled trial recruited 80 patients with ischemic stroke treated in our hospital from September 2021 to June 2022 and assigned them to receive either aspirin enteric tablets and atorvastatin calcium tablets (control group) or aspirin enteric tablets and simvastatin tablets plus salvia polyphenolic acid (observation group), with 40 cases in each group. The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy and the secondary endpoints included neurological function, disease recovery, limb and cognitive function and quality of life. Patients with salvia polyphenolic acid had significantly higher clinical efficacy than those without (p<0.05). Salvia polyphenolic acid resulted in significantly lower national institutes of health stroke scale scores and higher ability of daily living scores in patients vs. routine management (p<0.05). Patients in the observation group showed significantly higher Fugl-Meyer and Montreal cognitive assessment scores and World Health Organization quality of life brief version scores than those in the control group (p<0.05). Salvia polyphenolic acid significantly ameliorates the stroke status of ischemic stroke patients, promotes the recovery of neurological functions, significantly enhances the patient’s living ability and therapeutic effects, and optimizes the patient’s limb and cognitive functions, thus effectively improving the quality of life and promoting the patient’s recovery. xxx hindi video, hd fullsex videos, indian group porn video, ove sex video, indian village wife early morning sex, indian porn kamasutra
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".