MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381598289 · doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07494-w

Surgical techniques for medial Patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of level I and II studies

2023· review· en· W4381598289 on OpenAlexaff
Harjind Kahlon, Prushoth Vivekanantha, Benjamin Blackman, Dan Cohen, Tyler Mckechnie, Lily Park, Darren de

Bibliographic record

VenueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedial patellofemoral ligamentFixation (population genetics)Meta-analysisSurgerySystematic reviewLigamentMEDLINEOrthodonticsPhysical therapyOrthopedic surgeryInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose To determine the most optimal surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR). Methods Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 13 th , 2022, for level I or II studies comparing MPFLR techniques. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R‐AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on patient‐reported outcome measures were recorded. Quality assessment was carried out using the MINORS and Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tools. Certainty of evidence was carried out with the GRADE assessment tool. Results Ten studies comprising 723 patients (723 knees) were included in this review. The weighted mean difference in Kujala, Lysholm, and IKDC scores comparing single‐ and double‐tunnel patellar drilling techniques was 2.66 (95% CI −1.05–6.37, p = 0.16, I 2 = 0%) with moderate certainty, 0.78 (95% CI −9.02–10.58, p = 0.88, I 2 = 87%) with low certainty, and 1.71 (95% CI −2.43–5.86, p = 0.42, I 2 = 0%) with low certainty, respectively. Double‐suture anchor patellar fixation demonstrated greater Kujala scores than transpatellar fixation (87.1 ± 2.8 vs 84.0 ± 3.8, p < 0.001) with moderate certainty. Y‐shaped graft patellar fixation demonstrated superior Kujala scores to C‐shaped graft patellar fixation (95.9 ± 4.7 vs 91.3 ± 9.7, p = 0.001) with moderate certainty. Augmentation of femoral fixation with polyester sutures demonstrated superior Kujala scores (97.8 ± 6.4. vs 88.0 ± 6.3, p < 0.005) with low certainty. Four‐stranded grafts demonstrated greater Kujala scores than two‐stranded grafts (93.5 ± 2.6 vs 91.6 ± 3.5, p = 0.01) with low certainty. Conclusion The optimal MPFLR surgical technique is likely to utilize a four‐stranded graft using either endobutton, double‐suture anchor, or transosseous suture patellar fixation with polyester suture augmented interference screw femoral fixation. Orthopedic surgeons can consider employing such a technique to improve patient outcomes by conferring greater graft stability, strength, and function. Level of evidence Level II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology ArthroscopySame topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207