MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381619336 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt23.161

Flow boiling heat transfer of R134a: Effect of heat flux and Dry-out characteristics

2023· article· en· W4381619336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ernest Gyan Bediako, Petra Dančová, Anas F. A. Elbarghthi, Tomáš Vít

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTechnická Univerzita v Liberci
KeywordsNucleate boilingBoilingCritical heat fluxHeat transferHeat fluxFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsMechanicsMaterials scienceFlux (metallurgy)Flow boilingPhysicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an experimental analysis of flow boiling heat transfer of R134a refrigerant in a smooth horizontal stainless-steel tube with the goal of investigating the effect of heat flux on heat transfer coefficient and dry-out characteristics.The experiment was performed for heat fluxes ranging from 7.2 kW/m 2 to 47.4 kW/m 2 , mass flux of 300 kg/m 2 s and saturation pressure of 460 kPa.At low heat flux, the heat transfer is predominantly controlled by convection boiling with a higher slope of heat transfer coefficient.As heat flux increases, nucleate boiling begins to predominate the heat transfer.The predominance of nucleate boiling is strongly experienced at low vapor quality when the higher slope in convective boiling begins to disappear as nucleate boiling dominates.Dry-out vapor quality incipience (_) is not highly affected by heat flux.All the dry-out vapor quality incipience correlations investigated predicted well the vapor quality for which dry-out begins and ends. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207