A Study on the Heat Transfer Characteristics of Semi- Flooded Type Evaporator Fin Tube for Adsorption Chiller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the heat transfer performance of an adsorption chiller's evaporator with and without a hydrophilic coating applied to a fin-tube heat exchanger.The evaporator used in this study is a semi-flooded type, which utilizes the capillary phenomenon to induce efficient refrigerant evaporation without requiring a refrigerant circulation pump.The hydrophilic coating is prepared by using a coating solution of aluminum oxide and a water-soluble hardening agent, which is then applied using the dip-coating method.The researchers investigated the effect of the weight ratio of aluminum oxide powder as a coating variable and found that a coating solution with a weight ratio of 31 wt% resulted in excellent coating surfaces in almost all ranges.The study revealed that the heat transfer rate and overall heat transfer coefficient of the fin-tube coated with this coating method increased by up to 1.6 times compared to the uncoated case under the operating conditions of the adsorption-type evaporator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".