THE RELATIONS BETWEEN CANADA AND THE USA IN 1957-1963. STAGES AND THE HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses the relationship between Canada and the USA during Prime Minister John Diefenbaker’s premiership in 1957–1963. Based on the analysis of the relevant source and historiographical background, the author of the article comes to the conclusion that personal hostility and mutual misunderstanding between John Kennedy and John Diefenbaker shaped the nature of the relationship between Canada and the USA in 1961–1963. The author believes that Diefenbaker’s anti-Americanism in 1961–1963 did not have a clear ideological background, and was the result of a number of factors, and, above all, the populism of the Prime Minister of Canada, as well as his poor personal relations with John Kennedy. On the contrary, according to the author, in the 1957–1960 period, anti-Americanism was missing in the foreign policy strategy of Diefenbaker, and that is why the latter advocated a close military cooperation with the United States, which was implemented in 1958 through the conclusion of the NORAD agreement. From the author’s point of view, the relations between Canada and the USA in 1957–1963 underwent a serious transformation – from the consensus with Eisenhower to the complete lack of understanding with Kennedy. The latter failed to find a necessary approach to Diefenbaker who, guided by negative emotions towards Kennedy during the Caribbean crisis, did nothing to fulfill his allied obligations with regard to the United States. The author emphasizes that both sides are to blame for the deterioration of the relations between Canada and the USA in 1961–1963
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".