MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381662396 · doi:10.1002/tax.12960

(290–295) Proposals to amend Division <scp>III</scp> to create an “Editorial Committee for Fungi” and to shift the timing of appointment of the Deputy Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau

2023· article· en· W4381662396 on OpenAlexaff
Tom W. May, Konstanze Bensch, David L. Hawksworth, James C. Lendemer, Scott A. Redhead, Nicholas J. Turland

Bibliographic record

VenueTaxon · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceNomenclatureMandatePolitical scienceLawBiologyComputer scienceBotanyTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the Nomenclature Section of each International Botanical Congress (IBC) the Editorial Committee (elected at that Congress) is empowered to write the new version of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants arising from that Congress. The Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) introduced Div. III Prov. 8 that mandates the Fungal Nomenclature Session (FNS) of an International Mycological Congress (IMC) to approve alterations to Chapter F of the Code, the section that contains material solely related to names of organisms treated as fungi. An oversight in the new provision was a mechanism to formally establish the equivalent of the Editorial Committee, as far as having a committee to prepare the revised Chapter F after each IMC. An attempt to rectify this omission, by making specific reference to an “Editorial Committee for Fungi”, was made via a proposal from the floor at the FNS of the San Juan IMC (Prop. F-010). However, at the FNS this proposal was withdrawn (May & al. in IMA Fungus 9(2): xxii–xxvii. 2018) after discussions made it clear that the proposal was most likely outside the mandate of the FNS – because the governance provisions in Div. III state that the FNS deals with “proposals relating to the content of Chapter F” but “excluding any other content”. In order to proceed with production of the San Juan Chapter F, an ad hoc “Editorial Committee for Fungi”, as allowed under Div. III Prov. 5.2(e) and 8.1, was approved by the FNS of the San Juan IMC at the beginning of the FNS, prior to voting on individual proposals (May & al. in IMA Fungus 10(21). 2019). This “Editorial Committee for Fungi” produced the San Juan Chapter F (May & al., l.c. 2019). The proposed changes enable formal approval of the “Editorial Committee for Fungi” as one of the suite of Permanent Nomenclature Committees under Div. III Prov. 7. The Editorial Committee for Fungi will make any necessary changes to the Chapter F arising from the FNS of an IMC. Proposed wording is based on existing provisions of Div. III, dealing with governance, following the principle adhered to in the original changes to Div. III in relation to governance of names of fungi (May in Taxon 65: 921–925. 2016) – which was to mirror existing procedures as closely as possible. IBCs are normally held every six years while IMCs are normally held every four years. To reflect these different cycles, we also propose to alter the timing of appointment of the Deputy Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau from the current “no later than three years prior” to the IMC to two years prior, i.e. halfway through the time between IMCs. This change does not preclude the appointment being made earlier. “4.12. The Nominating Committee is charged with preparing lists of candidates to serve on the Permanent Nomenclature Committees (with the exception of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi and the Editorial Committee for Fungi; see Prov. 4.13), in consultation with the current secretaries of those committees, and to propose the Rapporteur-général for the next International Botanical Congress. The nominations of the Nominating Committee are subject to approval by the Nomenclature Section.” “4.13. The Nominating Committee of the Fungal Nomenclature Session (Prov. 8.1) is charged with preparing lists of candidates (a) to serve on the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi, in consultation with the current Secretary of that Committee, and (b) to serve on the Editorial Committee for Fungi; and to propose the Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau for the next International Mycological Congress. The nominations of the Nominating Committee of the Fungal Nomenclature Session are subject to approval by the Fungal Nomenclature Session.” “7.1. There are nine ten Permanent Nomenclature Committees, including five specialist committees (clauses (e f)–(i j)): (a) General Committee; (b) Editorial Committee; (c) Editorial Committee for Fungi; (c d) Committee on Institutional Votes; (d e) Registration Committee; (e f) Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants; (f g) Nomenclature Committee for Bryophytes; (g h) Nomenclature Committee for Fungi; (h i) Nomenclature Committee for Algae; (i j) Nomenclature Committee for Fossils.” “7.4bis. The Editorial Committee for Fungi is elected by an International Mycological Congress and comprises individuals who should preferably have been present at the Fungal Nomenclature Session of the relevant International Mycological Congress and includes the Secretary of the Editorial Committee for this Code. The Secretary and Deputy Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Session of the relevant International Mycological Congress serve as Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Editorial Committee for Fungi.” [Based on existing Prov. 7.4] Renumber existing Prov. 7.5–7.11 accordingly. “7.11bis. The Editorial Committee for Fungi is charged with the preparation and publication of Chapter F in conformity with the decisions approved by the relevant International Mycological Congress. It is empowered to make the editorial modifications specified in Prov. 7.11.” [Based on existing Prov. 7.11] Renumber existing Prov. 7.12–7.15 accordingly. “8.1. For proposals relating to the content of Chapter F, which brings together the provisions of this Code that deal solely with names of organisms treated as fungi (but excluding any other content), exactly the same procedures outlined in Prov. 1–7 are to be followed except that in Prov. 1, 2, 4, and 5 mentions of International Botanical Congress, Nomenclature Section [of that Congress], Bureau of Nomenclature, and Nominating Committee, and Editorial Committee are to be replaced by International Mycological Congress, Fungal Nomenclature Session [of that Congress], Fungal Nomenclature Bureau, and Nominating Committee of the Fungal Nomenclature Session, and Editorial Committee for Fungi, respectively; and officers such as President, Rapporteur-général, and Vice-rapporteur (these specifically renamed Chair, Secretary, and Deputy Secretary, respectively) are to be understood as members of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau rather than the Bureau of Nomenclature (specifically in Prov. 1.1, 1.2, 1.4 footnote, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.6, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5, 4.7, 4.8, 4.10, 4.11, 5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, and 5.8; but not in Prov. 5.3 and 5.4; and the following clauses do not apply: Prov. 5.1(e) and (f) and Prov. 5.2(g)). See also Prov. 4.12, 4.13, 7.1, 7.4bis, and 7.11bis.” “8.5. The Fungal Nomenclature Session has the following functions: […] (e) elects the ordinary members of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi; (f) elects the ordinary members of the Editorial Committee for Fungi; (f g) elects the Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau for the next International Mycological Congress; (g h) receives reports of Special-purpose Committees dealing with matters relating solely to names of organisms treated as fungi.” “8.10. The decisions taken at the Fungal Nomenclature Session of an International Mycological Congress relating solely to names of organisms treated as fungi, once accepted by a subsequent plenary session of the same Congress, are binding on the Nomenclature Section convened at the subsequent International Botanical Congress. Such decisions will, however, be open for any editorial adjustments deemed necessary by the Editorial Committee for Fungi after consultation with the Editorial Committee for this Code.” “8.11. Certain publications, which may be electronic or printed or both, appear as soon as feasible after an International Mycological Congress, not necessarily in this sequence: (a) the Congress-approved decisions and elections of the Fungal Nomenclature Session including the results of the preliminary guiding vote; (b) the announcement of Special-purpose Committees and their membership; (c) the new edition of Chapter F of this Code; (d) a transcript of the Fungal Nomenclature Session.” “8.7. In the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau, the Deputy Secretary is appointed by the Secretary and approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi in consultation with the General Committee no later than three two years prior to the International Mycological Congress. The Deputy Secretary assists and, if necessary, serves in place of the Secretary.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTaxonSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207