MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4381662396 · doi:10.1002/tax.12960

(290–295) Proposals to amend Division <scp>III</scp> to create an “Editorial Committee for Fungi” and to shift the timing of appointment of the Deputy Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau

2023· article· en· W4381662396 sur OpenAlexaff
Tom W. May, Konstanze Bensch, David L. Hawksworth, James C. Lendemer, Scott A. Redhead, Nicholas J. Turland

Notice bibliographique

RevueTaxon · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLibrary scienceNomenclatureMandatePolitical scienceLawBiologyComputer scienceBotanyTaxonomy (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

After the Nomenclature Section of each International Botanical Congress (IBC) the Editorial Committee (elected at that Congress) is empowered to write the new version of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants arising from that Congress. The Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) introduced Div. III Prov. 8 that mandates the Fungal Nomenclature Session (FNS) of an International Mycological Congress (IMC) to approve alterations to Chapter F of the Code, the section that contains material solely related to names of organisms treated as fungi. An oversight in the new provision was a mechanism to formally establish the equivalent of the Editorial Committee, as far as having a committee to prepare the revised Chapter F after each IMC. An attempt to rectify this omission, by making specific reference to an “Editorial Committee for Fungi”, was made via a proposal from the floor at the FNS of the San Juan IMC (Prop. F-010). However, at the FNS this proposal was withdrawn (May & al. in IMA Fungus 9(2): xxii–xxvii. 2018) after discussions made it clear that the proposal was most likely outside the mandate of the FNS – because the governance provisions in Div. III state that the FNS deals with “proposals relating to the content of Chapter F” but “excluding any other content”. In order to proceed with production of the San Juan Chapter F, an ad hoc “Editorial Committee for Fungi”, as allowed under Div. III Prov. 5.2(e) and 8.1, was approved by the FNS of the San Juan IMC at the beginning of the FNS, prior to voting on individual proposals (May & al. in IMA Fungus 10(21). 2019). This “Editorial Committee for Fungi” produced the San Juan Chapter F (May & al., l.c. 2019). The proposed changes enable formal approval of the “Editorial Committee for Fungi” as one of the suite of Permanent Nomenclature Committees under Div. III Prov. 7. The Editorial Committee for Fungi will make any necessary changes to the Chapter F arising from the FNS of an IMC. Proposed wording is based on existing provisions of Div. III, dealing with governance, following the principle adhered to in the original changes to Div. III in relation to governance of names of fungi (May in Taxon 65: 921–925. 2016) – which was to mirror existing procedures as closely as possible. IBCs are normally held every six years while IMCs are normally held every four years. To reflect these different cycles, we also propose to alter the timing of appointment of the Deputy Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau from the current “no later than three years prior” to the IMC to two years prior, i.e. halfway through the time between IMCs. This change does not preclude the appointment being made earlier. “4.12. The Nominating Committee is charged with preparing lists of candidates to serve on the Permanent Nomenclature Committees (with the exception of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi and the Editorial Committee for Fungi; see Prov. 4.13), in consultation with the current secretaries of those committees, and to propose the Rapporteur-général for the next International Botanical Congress. The nominations of the Nominating Committee are subject to approval by the Nomenclature Section.” “4.13. The Nominating Committee of the Fungal Nomenclature Session (Prov. 8.1) is charged with preparing lists of candidates (a) to serve on the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi, in consultation with the current Secretary of that Committee, and (b) to serve on the Editorial Committee for Fungi; and to propose the Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau for the next International Mycological Congress. The nominations of the Nominating Committee of the Fungal Nomenclature Session are subject to approval by the Fungal Nomenclature Session.” “7.1. There are nine ten Permanent Nomenclature Committees, including five specialist committees (clauses (e f)–(i j)): (a) General Committee; (b) Editorial Committee; (c) Editorial Committee for Fungi; (c d) Committee on Institutional Votes; (d e) Registration Committee; (e f) Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants; (f g) Nomenclature Committee for Bryophytes; (g h) Nomenclature Committee for Fungi; (h i) Nomenclature Committee for Algae; (i j) Nomenclature Committee for Fossils.” “7.4bis. The Editorial Committee for Fungi is elected by an International Mycological Congress and comprises individuals who should preferably have been present at the Fungal Nomenclature Session of the relevant International Mycological Congress and includes the Secretary of the Editorial Committee for this Code. The Secretary and Deputy Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Session of the relevant International Mycological Congress serve as Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Editorial Committee for Fungi.” [Based on existing Prov. 7.4] Renumber existing Prov. 7.5–7.11 accordingly. “7.11bis. The Editorial Committee for Fungi is charged with the preparation and publication of Chapter F in conformity with the decisions approved by the relevant International Mycological Congress. It is empowered to make the editorial modifications specified in Prov. 7.11.” [Based on existing Prov. 7.11] Renumber existing Prov. 7.12–7.15 accordingly. “8.1. For proposals relating to the content of Chapter F, which brings together the provisions of this Code that deal solely with names of organisms treated as fungi (but excluding any other content), exactly the same procedures outlined in Prov. 1–7 are to be followed except that in Prov. 1, 2, 4, and 5 mentions of International Botanical Congress, Nomenclature Section [of that Congress], Bureau of Nomenclature, and Nominating Committee, and Editorial Committee are to be replaced by International Mycological Congress, Fungal Nomenclature Session [of that Congress], Fungal Nomenclature Bureau, and Nominating Committee of the Fungal Nomenclature Session, and Editorial Committee for Fungi, respectively; and officers such as President, Rapporteur-général, and Vice-rapporteur (these specifically renamed Chair, Secretary, and Deputy Secretary, respectively) are to be understood as members of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau rather than the Bureau of Nomenclature (specifically in Prov. 1.1, 1.2, 1.4 footnote, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.6, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5, 4.7, 4.8, 4.10, 4.11, 5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, and 5.8; but not in Prov. 5.3 and 5.4; and the following clauses do not apply: Prov. 5.1(e) and (f) and Prov. 5.2(g)). See also Prov. 4.12, 4.13, 7.1, 7.4bis, and 7.11bis.” “8.5. The Fungal Nomenclature Session has the following functions: […] (e) elects the ordinary members of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi; (f) elects the ordinary members of the Editorial Committee for Fungi; (f g) elects the Secretary of the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau for the next International Mycological Congress; (g h) receives reports of Special-purpose Committees dealing with matters relating solely to names of organisms treated as fungi.” “8.10. The decisions taken at the Fungal Nomenclature Session of an International Mycological Congress relating solely to names of organisms treated as fungi, once accepted by a subsequent plenary session of the same Congress, are binding on the Nomenclature Section convened at the subsequent International Botanical Congress. Such decisions will, however, be open for any editorial adjustments deemed necessary by the Editorial Committee for Fungi after consultation with the Editorial Committee for this Code.” “8.11. Certain publications, which may be electronic or printed or both, appear as soon as feasible after an International Mycological Congress, not necessarily in this sequence: (a) the Congress-approved decisions and elections of the Fungal Nomenclature Session including the results of the preliminary guiding vote; (b) the announcement of Special-purpose Committees and their membership; (c) the new edition of Chapter F of this Code; (d) a transcript of the Fungal Nomenclature Session.” “8.7. In the Fungal Nomenclature Bureau, the Deputy Secretary is appointed by the Secretary and approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi in consultation with the General Committee no later than three two years prior to the International Mycological Congress. The Deputy Secretary assists and, if necessary, serves in place of the Secretary.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,160
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,322

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTaxonMême sujetPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesTravaux en français237 207