A convenient synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of novel schiff base heterocycles as potential antimicrobial, antitubercular agents and their structural activity relationship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of (E)-1-methyl-3-((substituted phenylimino)methyl)quinolin-2(1H)-one schiff bases (3a-j) bearing quinoline moiety synthesized successfully in ethanol by condensation of starting material 1-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinoline-3-carbaldehyde (1) with various substituted anilines (2a-j). The structure of the newly synthesized compounds was confirmed by proton (1H) and carbon (13C) nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR), Mass spectroscopic study and elemental analysis. The in-vitro antimicrobial activity of the synthesized compounds was undertaken by agar well diffusion method against gram positive bacteria (Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus cereus) gram negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Acetobactor sp.) and antifungal activity against (Aspergillus Flavus and Pichnanomala). Further the compounds which shows good activity (3b, 3c, 3d, 3f, 3g and 3j) are screened for in-vitro antitubercular activity by Micro-plate alamar blue assay (MABA) method against mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain provided important information about activity against these strains. The structure activities of the synthesized compounds were also discussed. Compounds 3a, 3c, 3d, 3f and 3g show good argument with the different substituent attached to the phenyl ring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".