Bureaucratic Turbulence After the Transfer of Structural to Functional Positions at the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research described the phenomenon of bureaucratic turbulence in the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs after the transfer of structural to functional positions. Furthermore, changes in the organization and individual civil servants were characterized by organizational, position, and performance transformations. The policy of switching functional roles is considered as the most effective method for transforming the lengthy, cumbersome, and slow bureaucratic chain into a new mode of operation based on coordination and collaboration. This research used a qualitative approach that begins with assumptions, perspectives, problem studies, and theoretical used to investigate information from individuals and groups on a social problem. Meanwhile, data collection is carried out by documentation, observation, and literature research to be analyzed and concluded. The results showed that turbulence occurs during the transition period as a process of shifting work culture, behavior, and changes in the mindset of civil servants. The changing needs of the skuel model with a flat circular structure prioritize collaboration and coordination across work groups. Changes in three areas of bureaucratic simplification, such as organizational, position, and performance transformations, resulted in turbulence within the organization. The implementation of functional positions should be reviewed. This is because the implementation requires many apparatus with generalist competency who have greater insight and opportunities to occupy several positions with a wider scope. Generalist competency is needed to link economic affairs across ministries and agencies. Therefore, innovation and problem-solving can be conducted comprehensively through a wider helicopter view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".