MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381686881 · doi:10.7759/cureus.40784

Understanding the Utilization, Challenges, and Attitudes Towards Laboratory Testing and Radiological Imaging Among Chiropractors in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey

2023· article· en· W4381686881 on OpenAlexaff
Wai Ting Lee, Eric Chun‐Pu Chu, Cherie Chau

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Chiropractic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiological weaponChiropracticFamily medicineDescriptive statisticsDemographicsCross-sectional studyMedical imagingPopulationAlternative medicineEnvironmental healthPathologyRadiologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1, 2023. The target population for the survey was registered chiropractors in Hong Kong, which has a total of 325 practitioners. A total of 151 chiropractors participated in the survey, resulting in a response rate of 46.5%. The respondents provided information on their demographics, years of experience, practice settings, awareness of their right to request diagnostic tests, utilization of laboratory testing and imaging, and attitudes towards evidence-based practice. The survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result The survey findings revealed that a significant proportion of chiropractors in Hong Kong utilized laboratory testing and radiological imaging in their practice. Most respondents reported using laboratory testing to diagnose medical conditions and monitor existing conditions. Imaging is commonly used for diagnosing medical conditions and monitoring disease progression. However, a notable proportion of chiropractors reported facing rejection of their tests and imaging requests, which limited their ability to provide optimal care to their patients. The identified challenges included high rejection rates for specific imaging requests, leading to patient frustration, increased costs, and delayed diagnosis. Nevertheless, chiropractors in Hong Kong showed a strong belief in evidence-based practice and demonstrated a willingness to search for literature and incorporate it into their daily practice. By addressing this issue, our aim was to gain valuable insights into the status of laboratory testing and radiological imaging among chiropractors in Hong Kong. The findings of this study underscore the necessity for collaborative efforts among chiropractors, healthcare professionals, healthcare facilities, policymakers, and insurance companies to effectively address the challenges identified and improve patient care outcomes. Specifically, enhancing access to diagnostic tests and working towards reducing rejection rates will play a pivotal role in supporting chiropractors' role as primary healthcare providers in Hong Kong.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.462
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.043 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207