Role of MCD and Mössbauer Spectroscopy in the Explanation of the Properties of a Highly Soluble (μ-Oxo)bis[tetra(<i>tert</i>-butyl)(phthalocyaninato)iron(III)] Complex, Its Pyridine Adduct, and Redox Forms Oxidized under Anaerobic Conditions in Non-Coordinating Solvents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solid-state Mössbauer spectra of a highly soluble (μ-oxo)bis[tetra( tert -butyl)(phthalocyaninato)iron(III)] complex 1 ((Pc t Bu Fe) 2 O) consist of two doublets that represent bent geometry in μ-oxo(1) ( 1a, Δ E Q = 0.43 mm/s, T = 10 K) and linear geometry in μ-oxo(2) ( 1b, Δ E Q = 1.40 mm/s, T = 10 K) isomers with the ratio between two isomers depending on the purification method. Both isomers were found to be diamagnetic and transform entirely to the 1a isomer in solution. The room- and low-temperature magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectra of 1a μ-oxo(1) show one Faraday A- and one B-term between 670 and 720 nm, which correlate with the 690 nm band and 709 nm shoulder observed in the UV–vis spectrum of this compound. UV–vis and MCD spectra of 1a are almost independent of the temperature. Both 1a and 1b are diamagnetic between room temperature and 4 K. Electrochemical experiments show up to three oxidations and up to four reduction processes in 1a . Its oxidation under spectroelectrochemical or chemical (in the absence of oxygen-containing oxidants) conditions in non-coordinating solvents results in the formation of broad NIR bands around 1195 nm (first oxidation) and 1264 nm (second oxidation). The MCD spectra of the redox-active species show a Faraday B-term signal with negative amplitude in this region and are very different from those in the monomeric Pc t Bu (1−)Fe III X 2 complexes 5X (X = Cl – or CF 3 CO 2 – ). The pyridine adduct of 1a ((PyPc t Bu Fe) 2 O; 2Py ) is paramagnetic (μ B = 2.19, g = 2.11, and J = −6.1 cm –1 ) and has a major peak at 627 nm of its UV–vis spectrum, which is associated with a MCD pseudo A-term. Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations, along with the exciton coupling theory, were used to explain the unusually red-shifted intense transitions in 1a as well as the H-aggregate-like spectra of the pyridine adduct 2Py .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".