MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381738987 · doi:10.53819/81018102t5203

Funds Management and Performance of Infrastructural Projects in Canada: A Case Study of Trans-Canada Highway

2023· article· en· W4381738987 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicConstruction Project Management and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessDeliverableScheduleStakeholderPopulationFinanceSustainabilityStrategic planningEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Funds management is a crucial aspect of infrastructure projects, ensuring that financial resources are effectively allocated and utilized to achieve project goals. It involves the strategic planning, budgeting, and monitoring of funds throughout the project lifecycle. The performance of infrastructural projects is measured through various indicators, including cost management, schedule adherence, quality of deliverables, and overall project outcomes. Effective funds management plays a significant role in project performance, as it helps ensure that funds are allocated optimally and used efficiently. Infrastructure projects often require substantial investments, and funds management helps mitigate financial risks by monitoring expenditures, identifying cost overruns or budget deviations, and implementing corrective measures. It also involves financial forecasting and risk assessment to anticipate and address potential challenges or constraints that may impact project performance. The study used the descriptive research design. The target population was 35 members of Transport Canada. The study did sampling of 25 respondents that were selected from the target population of 35 members of Transport Canada. The collection of data was conducted through stratified random sampling whereby questionnaires were used to gather data. The study concluded that the challenges surrounding funds management, cost control, performance evaluation, environmental considerations, and stakeholder collaboration must be addressed to ensure the optimal utilization of resources and the long-term sustainability of the project. Securing stable and adequate funding sources from national and provincial governments is crucial for the Trans-Canada Highway's continued development and maintenance. The study recommended that both national and provincial governments should establish a long-term funding plan that spans the entire lifecycle of the project. Regular assessments and data collection should be conducted to identify bottlenecks, areas for improvement, and emerging needs. Keywords: Funds Management, Performance, Infrastructural Projects, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Entrepreneurship & Project ManagementSame topicConstruction Project Management and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207