MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Live Stateful Migration of a Virtual Sub-Network

2023· article· en· W4381744874 on OpenAlexaff
Farid Zandi, Sepehr Abbasi Zadeh, Soheil Abbasloo, Parsa Pazhooheshy, Yashar Ganjali, Zhenhua Hu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStateful firewallComputer scienceDistributed computingLive migrationPrioritizationCloud computingTask (project management)Computer networkVirtualizationTraffic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traffic processing on cloud-scale bandwidths has given rise to a new type of network structure, comprising a large number of highly-structured virtual entities working in close harmony. This structure, which we call a virtual sub-network, might be in need of migration, for reasons of load-balancing, maintenance, and disaster prevention. In this paper, we argue that the common migration schemes are not adequate for the complexity of this task. Therefore, we present Qanat, a migration system specifically optimized for the live migration of a virtual sub-network in its entirety to a different physical location. We show how Qanat employs widely-used techniques, such as traffic prioritization, buffering, and network tunnels, to overcome the main issues of live migration. In the paper, we categorize the main challenges of the migration task, provide an analytical study of Qanat’s algorithms, and measure its performance metrics through large-scale simulations. We conclude that Qanat can efficiently and transparently migrate virtual sub-networks and can provide a useful tool for system administrators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207