MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381802817 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.4.001

Joint optimization of production and maintenance scheduling for unrelated parallel machine using hybrid discrete spider monkey optimization algorithm

2023· article· en· W4381802817 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yarong Chen, Liuyan Zhong, Chunchun Shena, Jabir Mumt, Fuh‐Der Chou

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmScheduling (production processes)InertiaGenetic algorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers an unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with variable maintenance based on machine reliability to minimize the maximum completion time. To obtain the optimal solution of small-scale problems, we firstly establish a mixed integer programming model. To solve the medium and large-scale problems efficiently and effectively, we develop a hybrid discrete spider monkey optimization algorithm (HDSMO), which combines discrete spider monkey optimization (DSMO) with genetic algorithm (GA). A few additional features are embedded in the HDSMO: a three-phase constructive heuristic is proposed to generate better initial solution, and an individual updating method considering the inertia weight is used to balance the exploration and exploitation capabilities. Moreover, a problem-oriented neighborhood search method is designed to improve the search efficiency. Experiments are conducted on a set of randomly generated instances. The performance of the proposed HDSMO algorithm is investigated and compared with that of other existing algorithms. The detailed results show that the proposed HDSMO algorithm can obtain significantly better solutions than the DSMO and GA algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering ComputationsSame topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207