The asymptotic concentration approach combined with isogeometric analysis for topology optimization of two-dimensional linear elasticity structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<abstract> <p>We propose an asymptotic concentration approach combined with isogeometric analysis (IGA) for the topology optimization of two-dimensional (2D) linear elasticity structures under the commonly-used framework of the solid isotropic materials and penalty (SIMP) model. Based on the SIMP framework, the B-splines are used as basis functions to describe geometric model in structural finite element analysis, which closely combines geometric modeling with structural analysis. Isogeometric analysis is utilized to define the geometric characteristics of the 2D linear elasticity structures, which can greatly improve the calculation accuracy. In addition, to eliminate the gray-scale intervals usually caused by the intermediate density in the SIMP approach, we utilize the asymptotic concentration method to concentrate the intermediate density values on either 0 or 1 gradually. Consequently, the intermediate densities representing gray-scale intervals in topology optimization results are sufficiently eliminated by virtue of the asymptotic concentration method. The effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method are illustrated by several typical examples.</p> </abstract>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it