MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381886295 · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3289069

Privacy-Preserving Proxy Re-Encryption With Decentralized Trust Management for MEC-Empowered VANETs

2023· article· en· W4381886295 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Han, Daxin Tian, Jianshan Zhou, Xuting Duan, Zhengguo Sheng, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBroadcast encryptionEncryptionComputer networkComputer securityServerCryptographyInformation privacyPublic-key cryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-access edge computing (MEC) technology is widely deployed at the edge of Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) to enhance their communication and computational capabilities. However, existing security and privacy preservation solutions for MEC applications in VANETs face several challenges, such as the risk of privacy exposure of vehicle authentication, increased overhead due to cryptographic algorithms, as well as resource occupation and malicious attacks on edge servers. In this paper, we propose an aggregated security solution for the confidential, efficient, and trustworthy sharing of data while safeguarding the privacy of vehicle identities. Firstly, we present a broadcast proxy re-encryption scheme based on cubic spline interpolation that ensures the security of the VANET system and the identity privacy of large-scale vehicles. The re-encryption system is designed to prioritize the reduction of re-encryption computation time rather than focusing on the sizes of re-encryption keys and ciphertexts. We further model the aggregation overhead in terms of communication and computation. Additionally, we propose an efficient protocol based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerant (PBFT) consensus to facilitate decentralized trust management for edge proxy servers. Our security analysis demonstrates that the proposed scheme satisfies the security and confidentiality requirements for data sharing in VANETs. Finally, we provide extensive simulations that reveal the performance and effectiveness of our solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent VehiclesSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207