MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381890139 · doi:10.1101/2023.06.22.545970

Multichannel joint image reconstruction allows for artifact-free focused small field of view magnetic particle imaging

2023· preprint· en· W4381890139 on OpenAlexaff
Julia J. Gevaert, Justin Konkle, Patrick Goodwill, Paula J. Foster

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic particle imagingSIGNAL (programming language)ScannerComputer scienceComputer visionArtifact (error)Field of viewEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionJoint (building)PhysicsOpticsArtificial intelligenceMagnetic nanoparticles

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) directly detects superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) labeled cells. We have used MPI to detect SPIO-labeled dendritic cells (DC) migrated to the popliteal lymph nodes (pLN) after injection into the hind footpads. However, in some cases the low pLN signal could not be resolved from nearby higher footpad signal where window leveling to pLN signal oversaturated the footpad signal. The same limitation occurs when SPIO is injected intravenously, accumulates in the liver, and prevents isolation of regions of interest with lower signals. Previous studies have reported on the issue of resolving a wide range of differing iron concentration. A small focused field of view (FOV), to exclude high sources of nearby signal cannot be performed with the standard reconstruction algorithm equipped on the MomentumTM MPI scanner because it is assumed that there is no signal at the edge of the FOV and these values are set to zero for each line along the transmit axis. However, when there is signal at the FOV edge, an inverted negative artifact is created. The multichannel joint reconstruction method uses an iterative reconstruction technique to recover edge information using information from an orthogonal axis, preventing this artifact and allowing the user to prescribe a small FOV on the region of interest. Here we describe the implementation of this method to isolate and quantify low regions of MPI signal from higher regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207