Thermochemical oxidation of methane by manganese oxides in hydrothermal sediments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Microbial anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to the reduction of Mn(IV)-oxides, typically MnO2, derived from continental weathering and riverine transport has been proposed as a globally important sink of methane. However, the potential role of hydrothermal Mn(IV) oxide-rich sediments as a methane sink, and the mechanisms of underpinning methane oxidation at high-temperature hydrothermal fields remain poorly understood. Here, we report the occurrence of almost pure rhodochrosite with extremely negative δ13CPDB values (as low as –76.4‰) in direct association with hausmannite formed through hydrothermal activity in the Late Triassic Heqing Mn deposit in Southern China. Based on detailed petrography and geochemistry, this rhodochrosite is interpreted as the result of the thermochemical oxidation of methane by hausmannite during early diagenesis. Given high hydrothermal Mn2+ and CH4 release coupled to low sulfate concentration observed in the Archean oceans, we propose that hydrothermal Mn(IV) oxides may have been effective methane sinks in Earth’s ancient oceans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".