MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381943268 · doi:10.3889/oamjms.2023.11393

The Correlation of Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein Level to Cognitive Function Outcome in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke Patient

2023· article· en· W4381943268 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dodik Tugasworo, Locoporta Agung, Retnaningsih Retnaningsih, Amin Husni, Aris Catur Bintoro, Arinta Puspita Wati

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlial fibrillary acidic proteinMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineAstrogliosisStroke (engine)CorrelationLacunar strokeCognitionBrain ischemiaIschemic strokeCardiologyCognitive impairmentIschemiaDiseaseCentral nervous systemPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT : Introduction : Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a filamentous protein found in central nervous system astrocytes. Increased serum GFAP levels are caused by the process of astrogliosis after ischemic stroke and are associated with multisynaptic disorders so that they are at risk of causing cognitive disorders. Objective: To analyze the correlation between GFAP levels and cognitive function output in acute lacunar ischemic stroke patients. Research Methods : Analytical observational with prospective cohort approach. The subjects of this study were Acute lacunar ischemic stroke patients with mild to moderate NIHSS scores. Serum GFAP levels were taken at the onset of 48-72 hours of stroke. Cognitive function was measured using the Indonesian version of MoCA (MoCA Ina) test on the seventh and thirtieth day. Bivariate and multivariate analyzes were performed to assess the correlation between GFAP levels, cognitive functions and the confounding factors. Results: There was a significant correlation between GFAP levels and the MoCA Ina scores on the seventh day (r= -0.32, p=0.044), the thirtieth day (r= -0.398, p=0.011), and improvement in MoCA Ina scores (r= -0.342, p = 0.031). There was a significant correlation between GFAP levels on the executive domain on the seventh day (p= 0.01) and thirtieth day (p= 0.005), visuospatial on seventh day (p= 0.004) and thirtieth day (p= 0.016), language on the thirtieth day (p = 0.005), and memory on thirtieth day (p= 0.001). There was no significant correlation between GFAP levels and improvements in attentional, memory, language, visuospatial, and executive domains. Conclusion: There was a significant correlation between GFAP levels and MoCA Ina scores on the seventh, thirtieth day and the improvement of MoCA Ina scores. There was a significant correlation between GFAP levels with the executive, visuospatial, language, and memory domains. Keywords: cognitive, GFAP, lacunar ischemic stroke, MoCA Ina

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access Macedonian Journal of Medical SciencesSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207