SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling determines brassinosteroid-induced transcriptional activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The brassinosteroid (BR) hormone is a central modulator of plant growth, development, and responses to stresses by activating or repressing the expression of thousands of genes through the transcription factor BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT 1 (BZR1) and its homologues. However, the molecular mechanism that determines the transcriptional activation versus repression activity of BZR1 remains largely unclear. Here, we show that BZR1-responsive transcriptional activation at thousands of loci requires the Switch defective/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF)-complexes-mediated chromatin accessibility regulation. BR-activated BZR1 controls the activation or repression of thousands of BZR1 target genes through reprograming genome-wide chromatin accessibility landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana . BZR1 physically interacts with the B RAHMA (BRM)- A ssociated S WI/SNF complexes (BAS), co-localizes with BRM on the genome, and enhances BRM occupancy at sites of increased accessibility by BR. Loss of BRM abrogates the capacity of BZR1 to increase but not decrease chromatin accessibility, blocks BR-induced hypocotyl elongation, and diminishes BZR1-mediated transcriptional activation rather than repression. Together, our work reveals that the BAS chromatin remodeling complex is a critical epigenetic regulatory partner in dictating BZR1-mediated transcriptional activation ability, thus providing a long sought mechanistic explanation for how BR signaling activates gene transcription in shaping diverse developmental programs. Teaser BZR1-responsive transcriptional activation activity at thousands of loci requires the SWI/SNF-complexes-mediated chromatin accessibility regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".