MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381956555 · doi:10.1097/cxa.0000000000000146

Navigating Treatment in the Shadow of the Overdose Crisis: Perspectives of Youth Experiencing Street-Involvement Across British Columbia

2022· article· en· W4381956555 on OpenAlex
Madison Thulien, Reith Charlesworth, Haleigh Anderson, Rainbow Dykeman, Katey Kincaid, Kali Sedgemore, Rod Knight, Danya Fast

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Addiction · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Innovation CouncilBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitShadow (psychology)Mental healthObservational studyMedicinePsychologyPublic relationsPsychiatryPolitical scienceGeographyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objective: Youth experiencing street-involvement are particularly vulnerable to substance use-related harms. Since an overdose public health emergency was declared in British Columbia (BC) in 2016, there have been concerted efforts to expand youth's access to integrated mental health and substance use treatment across the province. The present study sought to explore how youth were navigating this rapidly evolving treatment landscape. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with youth experiencing street-involvement in three BC cities, followed by a summit event in Vancouver. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded thematically alongside observational field notes. All activities were undertaken in collaboration with a Youth Advisory Council. Results: Across BC, youth expressed desires to achieve aspects of what some called a “normal life” following treatment, which required having “somewhere to go next.” In the absence of desirable housing and adequate income, youth were often left with the crushing sense that, despite their efforts, treatment would not ultimately help them to “get somewhere better.” Negative experiences in treatment settings were also shaped by the files that “followed” youth across care settings, inappropriate information sharing between providers, and an overemphasis on pharmacotherapies (namely, opioid agonist therapies and psychotropic medications). Conclusion: Our findings point to the inability of existing services and systems to address entrenched marginalization and chronic instability. Our findings also underscore the importance of relationship-, trust-, and future-building to providing treatment and care to youth. Young people must be empowered with control over their treatment trajectories, including decision-making surrounding pharmacotherapies and information sharing. Objectif: Les jeunes de la rue sont particulièrement vulnérables aux méfaits de la consommation de substances psychoactives. Depuis que le problème de surdoses a été déclaré comme une urgence de santé publique en Colombie-Britannique (C.-B.) en 2016, des efforts concertés ont été déployés pour améliorer l’accès des jeunes aux traitements intégrés de santé mentale et de consommation dans toute la province. La présente étude vise à explorer la façon dont les jeunes s’orientent dans ce contexte de traitement en constante évolution. Méthodologie: Des groupes de discussion ont été menés avec des jeunes de la rue dans trois villes de la Colombie-Britannique, suivis d’un sommet à Vancouver. Les enregistrements audio ont été transcrits textuellement et classés par thèmes avec les notes d’observation sur le terrain. Toutes les activités ont été réalisées avec la collaboration d’un conseil consultatif des jeunes. Résultats: Partout en Colombie-Britannique, les jeunes ont exprimé le désir de mener une « vie normale » après le traitement, ce qui implique d’avoir « quelque part où aller par la suite ». Sans logement ni revenu adéquats, les jeunes ont souvent le sentiment accablant que, malgré leurs efforts, ultimement, le traitement ne les aidera pas à « aller mieux ». Les expériences négatives dans les milieux de traitement étaient également liées aux dossiers qui « suivent » les jeunes dans différents contextes de soins, au partage inapproprié de renseignements entre les fournisseurs et à une insistance excessive sur les pharmacothérapies (à savoir, les traitements par agonistes opioïdes et les médicaments psychotropes). Conclusions: Nos constatations soulignent l’incapacité des services et systèmes existants à lutter contre la marginalisation profondément ancrée et l’instabilité chronique, de même que l’importance de miser sur les relations, la confiance et une vision tournée vers l’avenir pour offrir des traitements et des soins aux jeunes. Les jeunes doivent être outillés pour contrôler leur cheminement thérapeutique, y compris au regard des décisions sur la pharmacothérapie et le partage de renseignements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it