MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381985256 · doi:10.3934/jimo.2023056

Pseudomonotone variational inequality in action: Case of the French dairy industrial network dynamics

2023· article· en· W4381985256 on OpenAlexafffund
Arnaud Dragicevic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial and Management Optimization · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsCenter for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations
FundersInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementYork UniversityArizona State University
KeywordsDisequilibriumVariational inequalityUpstream (networking)Operator (biology)Synchronization (alternating current)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationInequalityPath (computing)Fixed pointPoint (geometry)Action (physics)Mathematical economicsEconomicsMathematicsComputer networkPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pseudomonotone operator serves to study the dynamic network equilibrium of the French dairy industry. Using a modified variational inequality model, which is based on the price variations, we reverse the typical problem formulation and claim that the absence of synchronization between the variations, which also need to be proportionate, is what causes the network disequilibrium. Provided the pseudomonotonicity of the mapping, the solution of the variational inequality problem also happens to be a fixed point. The model outputs show that the economic viability of the upstream agents is in conflict with the overall network equilibrium. The results further suggest that increasing the threshold of resale-below-cost should enlarge the asynchronicity between the upstream and instream price adjustments, which is problematic because the price variations are already asymmetric at the levels of upstream and downstream layers. The best path toward the network equilibrium would go by carrying out a further integration of the upstream layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial and Management OptimizationSame topicEconomic theories and modelsFrench-language works237,207