MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381987696 · doi:10.21037/jmai-23-10

Approximating femoral neck bone mineral density from hand, knee, and pelvis X-rays using deep learning

2023· article· en· W4381987696 on OpenAlexaff
Keyvan Golestan, Catriona Syme, Alexander Bilbily, Saba Zuberi, Maksims Volkovs, Tomi Poutanen, Mark Cicero

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Artificial Intelligence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityActivation LaboratoriesUniversity of TorontoAUG Signals (Canada)Sunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelvisBone mineralFemoral neckMedicineOrthodonticsGeologyRadiologyAnatomyComputer scienceOsteoporosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A tool trained to learn the complex features of bone and soft tissue attenuation to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck from standard hand, knee, and pelvis X-rays has the potential to opportunistically screen for low BMD in individuals that undergo such X-rays for any clinical indication, which in turn could empower patients and their providers to initiate preventative treatment. Methods: A retrospective study of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset consisting of hand, knee, and pelvis X-rays and corresponding dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived femoral neck BMD (examinations done between 2008 to 2010) from 553 unique patients with osteoarthritis (OA) (51% male), aged between 48 to 83 years old. Participants were divided into training and test splits using a stratified random sampling procedure to ensure equal distribution of sex and age decade. A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to learn visual features from raw X-ray images, which were then combined with sex and age of the patients to estimate their femoral neck BMD. Agreement between methods at estimating BMD was assessed with Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Agreement between methods at classifying low BMD (T-score <−1) was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Experimental results show superior performance of the deep learning (DL) model by using either hand, knee, and pelvis X-rays, compared to baseline models, and achieved sensitivities and specificities >75% in both females and in males. It is also shown that both the X-ray and co-variate data equally contribute to the model performance. Conclusions: These results indicate that low BMD at the femoral neck can be opportunistically screened from routinely acquired X-rays of the hand, knee, or pelvis, i.e., even when the femoral neck is not included in the field of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Artificial IntelligenceSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207