MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382010354 · doi:10.5430/wje.v13n1p30

Collaborative Practices to Empower Teachers’ Capacities for the 21st Century

2023· article· en· W4382010354 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Warawut Soipimai, Wirot Sanrattana

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpowermentParticipatory action researchAction researchPsychologyPedagogyCitizen journalismSociologyMathematics educationMedical educationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this research is to conduct an operation within the project entitled "Collaborative Practices for Empowering Teachers' Capabilities for the 21st Century in Benjamitra Wittaya School," which is one of the research project series related to the 21st century education under the Doctoral Program in Educational Administration, Mahamakut Buddhist University, Isan Campus. It employed Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology and consisted of two cycles of Planning, Acting, Observing, and Reflecting (PAOR) in each academic semester in the 2022 academic year. The expected outcomes of this study included changes in learning and knowledge acquisition resulting from the practical application of the research findings. Moreover, 12 teachers participated both as co-researchers and as the target group for development in this study. The results of the study were evaluated and compared across three phases: before and after the first cycle of PAOR and after the second cycle of PAOR. The findings revealed the followings: 1) a positive change had occurred where a teacher-researcher practiced self-empowerment to develop greater capabilities for the 21st century and both the teacher and their students demonstrated an increased ability to meet the demands of the 21st century. 2) the researcher, co-researchers, and school personnel gained an understanding of the benefits of utilizing the principle of collaborative work, which resulted in more effective outcomes compared to individualistic approaches. This confirmed the significance of the Participative Leadership Theory, which is founded on the idea that combining the thoughts of multiple individuals leads to better decision-making compared to relying solely on an individual's perspective. 3) a grounded theory emerged from practical experience referred to as the "Collaborative Practices Model for Empowering Teachers' Capabilities for the 21st Century in Benjamitra Wittaya School" in this research work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207