MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382025359 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljad113.105

P77 Deucravacitinib, an oral selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, vs. placebo and apremilast in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: achievement of absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index thresholds in two phase III trials

2023· article· en· W4382025359 on OpenAlexaff
Richard B. Warren, Mark Lebwohl, Melinda Gooderham, Diamant Thaçi, Peter Foley, Alice B. Gottlieb, Subhashis Banerjee, Lauren Hippeli, Renata M Kisa, C.E.M. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsProbity Medical ResearchSKiN HealthQueen's University
FundersEuropean League Against RheumatismBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasisPsoriasis Area and Severity IndexPlaceboApremilastInternal medicinePlaque psoriasisRandomized controlled trialGastroenterologyDermatologyPsoriatic arthritisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Deucravacitinib, an oral selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in the USA and several other countries and is under review by the European Medicines Agency and other health authorities, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The efficacy and safety results for deucravacitinib in the phase III, 52-week, double-blind POETYK PSO-1 (NCT03624127) and PSO-2 (NCT03611751) trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have been published (Armstrong AW, Gooderham M, Warren RB et al. Deucravacitinib vs. placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:29–39; Strober B, Thaçi D, Sofen H et al. Deucravacitinib vs. placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor psoriasis second trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:40–51). Additional efficacy outcomes using Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) measures were assessed. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 : 1 to oral deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily, placebo or apremilast 30 mg twice daily, with treatment switches at weeks 16 and 24 per study designs. Mean change from baseline PASI through to week 52, achievement of absolute PASI thresholds ≤ 3 and ≤ 4 at weeks 16 and 24 and proportions of patients treated continuously with deucravacitinib from day 1 who achieved absolute PASI thresholds ≤ 1, ≤ 2, ≤ 3, ≤ 4 and ≤ 5 at week 52 were determined. Mean baseline PASI was similar across groups in PSO-1 and PSO-2 (deucravacitinib, n = 332 and n = 511, respectively; placebo, n = 166 and n = 255; apremilast, n = 168 and n = 254). Mean change from baseline PASI (baseline mean 21.8) at peak efficacy at week 24 was −16.9 for PSO-1 patients treated continuously with deucravacitinib from day 1; decreases were maintained at week 52 (−17.1). At week 16, significantly higher proportions of deucravacitinib-treated patients vs. placebo and apremilast achieved absolute PASI thresholds ≤ 3 [PSO-1: 42.2%, 7.2% and 24.4%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo and apremilast); PSO-2: 40.9%, 6.7% and 29.5%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo and P = 0.002 vs. apremilast)] and ≤ 4 [PSO-1: 55.4%, 11.4% and 31.0%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo and apremilast); PSO-2: 49.5%, 9.4% and 37.4%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo and P = 0.001 vs. apremilast)]. Results were maintained for deucravacitinib vs. apremilast at week 24 (P < 0.001). Deucravacitinib patients treated continuously from day 1 achieved high rates of absolute PASI thresholds at week 52 in PSO-1 and PSO-2 (≤ 1, 31.3% and 23.4%, respectively; ≤ 2, 45.5% and 34.7%, respectively; ≤ 3, 54.5% and 44.0%, respectively; ≤ 4, 61.4% and 52.9%, respectively; ≤ 5, 66.0% and 59.5%, respectively). Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who received deucravacitinib achieved clinically meaningful absolute PASI outcomes superior to placebo and apremilast and showed good maintenance of these measures through to week 52. AcknowledgmentsWriting and editorial assistance was provided by Nick Cianciola PhD, CMPP, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Funding sourcesThis study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207