Morbidity and Etiology-Based Success Rate of Combined Endoscopic Ventriculostomy and Choroid Plexus Cauterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 1918 Infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Approaches to the treatment of infant hydrocephalous vary among centers. Standard shunting carries a significant infection rate, an unpredictable time-to-failure, and the life-long risk of recurrent failures. Combined choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has been increasingly employed over the past decade as an alternative approach in an attempt to avoid shunt dependency. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the reported morbidity associated with ETV/CPC and its rate of success reported for specific etiologies of infant hydrocephalus. The protocol of this study was registered with the International prospective register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the following registration number CRD 42022343898. The study utilized four databases of medical literature to perform a systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Several parameters were extracted from the included studies including authors, publication year, region, study design, sample size, mean age, success rate, complication rate, reported complications hydrocephalus etiology, median time-to-failure, secondary management after failure and mean follow up time. The outcomes of interest, success, and complication rates were pooled using 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria from an initial search result of 472 studies. The study included 1938 infants (1918 of which were included in the meta-analysis). The overall success rate of combined ETV/CPC is 0.59 (95% CI [0.53, 0.64], I2 = 82%). Etiology-based success rate is 0.71, 0.70, 0.64, and 0.52 for aqueductal stenosis, myelomeningocele, postinfectious hydrocephalus, and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, respectively. The overall complication rate is 0.04 (95% CI [0.02, 0.05], I2 = 14%). Our study presents a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence on the use of ETV/CPC for treating hydrocephalus in infants. The findings demonstrate the potential efficacy of this procedure; however, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations inherent in the included studies, such as selection bias and limited follow-up, which could have impacted the reported outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.017 | 0.041 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".