MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382069623 · doi:10.1177/09544070231182769

Multi-axis and cornering stiffness properties of non-pneumatic wheels with symmetric helical honeycomb spokes

2023· article· en· W4382069623 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Zhou, Darshan Vishnu Dorugade, Subhash Rakheja, Ramin Sedaghati

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessStructural engineeringHoneycombSlip angleFinite element methodMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialAutomotive engineeringSteering wheel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current non-pneumatic wheel (NPW) designs with non-helical honeycomb spokes generally show too high cornering stiffness and thereby rapid saturation of the cornering force, which may lead to inferior handling and directional control of the vehicle, particularly under high operating speeds. The design concept of NPWs with symmetric helical honeycomb spokes is thus proposed in this paper. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of a honeycomb NPW with symmetric helical spokes configurations of different cell and helix angles were developed in order to fundamentally study its multi-axis and cornering stiffness properties under a constant normal load. The validities of the developed NPW models with 0° helix angle and three different cell angles were demonstrated through comparisons of predicted wheel responses with results available in published studies. 3D simulations were conducted under two design constraints in terms of identical cell-wall thickness and identical load carrying capacity. The results suggest that increasing helix angle results in significantly greater in-plane shear stiffness of the honeycomb spokes and thus could effectively yield higher longitudinal and vertical stiffness of the NPW. An increase in helix angle also causes lower lateral stiffness for the wheel designs with 15.8° and 31.5° cell angles resulting from increases in the out-of-plane compliance of the spokes, apart from the notably lower cornering stiffness, particularly when it is increased to 30° and 45°. The cell-wall thickness, however, shows positive influences on multi-axis stiffness of the honeycomb wheel but negative effects on its cornering stiffness. The design concept of helical honeycomb spokes could offer better vehicle performances than the current designs in terms of braking/traction and handling characteristics. These are particularly important for promoting applications of the NPW in high-speed vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile EngineeringSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207