Knearst Algorithm Analysis – Neighbor Breast Cancer Prediction Coimbra
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A process to explain the results of the KNN algorithm analysis with the prediction of Breast Cancer Coimbra disease (Breast Cancer). The prediction output of the KNN algorithm will be added with the Simple Linear Regression algorithm modeling to measure the predictive data through a straight line as an illustration of the correlation relationship between 2 or more variables. Linear regression prediction is used as a technique for the relationship between variables in the prediction process of the Breast Cancer Coimbra data set (Breast Cancer). for the value of K in analyzing the KNN algorithm, take the nearest neighbor with the ranking results with K = 5 nearest neighbors which are taken in the KNN calculation. Which is where the output of the KNN algorithm classification will be analyzed with the Simple Linear Regression algorithm with Dependent (Cause) and Independent (effect) variables. The test results determine that the patient has breast cancer and the number of predictions based on age with glucose means that the patient is predicted to have breast cancer. analyze the KNN algorithm with Simple Liner Regression modeling with Python programming language.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it