MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382119027 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2023.3289159

An 8-Channel Ambulatory EEG Recording IC With In-Channel Fully-Analog Real-Time Motion Artifact Extraction and Removal

2023· article· en· W4382119027 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Dabbaghian, Hossein Kassiri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsArtifact (error)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringCMOSChannel (broadcasting)ChipArtificial intelligenceComputer hardwareEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

total area) with a channel architecture that conducts both the extraction and removal of motion artifacts on-chip and in-channel. The proposed dual-path feed-forward method for artifact extraction and removal is implemented in the analog domain, hence is needless of a DSP unit for artifact estimation, and its associated high-DR ADCs and DACs employed by the state of the art for artifact replica generation. Additionally, the presented architecture improves system's scalability as it enables channels' stand-alone operation, and yields the lowest reported channel power consumption among works featuring motion artifact detection/removal. Following an experimental study on electrode-skin interface electrical characteristics for dry electrodes in the absence and presence of motions, the article presents the channel architecture, its detailed signal transfer function analysis, circuit-level implementation, and experimental characterization results. Our measurement results show an amplification voltage gain of 48.3 dB, a bandwidth of 300 Hz, rail-to-rail input DC offset tolerance, and 41.5 dB artifact suppression, while consuming 55 μW per channel. The system's efficacy in EEG motion artifact suppression is validated experimentally, and system- and circuit-level features and performance metrics of the presented design are compared with the state of the art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207