MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· article· en· W4382139527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)ChinaLibrary sciencePolitical scienceMedical educationEngineeringMedicineComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering the unpredictable situation of COVID-19, as well as the health and safety of our participants and members of our research community is of top priority to the organizing committee. 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computing Technology (EECT 2023) planned to be held from March 24th-26th, 2023 in Sanya, China was changed to be held virtually through Zoom software. EECT 2023 is dedicated to addressing the challenges in the areas of Electrical, Electronics and Computing Technology as well as its applications, presenting the latest scientific research results related to these topics. EECT 2023 looks forward to bringing together researchers and practitioners from academia and industries to focus on related topics and establishing new collaboration in these areas. The conference was divided into three sessions, including keynote speeches, oral presentations, and poster presentations. In the keynote presentation’s part, we have 3 renowned professors present their insightful speeches. Each speaker allocated 50 minutes including 5min for Q&A to hold their speeches. Prof. Jizhong Zhu from South China University of Technology, Prof. Witod Pedrycz from University of Alberta, Prof. Fushuan Wen from Zhejiang University. For oral presentations, authors were given approximately 10-15 minutes to perform their oral presentations one by one. List of Conference Committee are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207