Evaluating the safety and efficacy of aminolevulinic acid 20% topical solution activated by pulsed dye laser and blue light in the treatment of facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common cutaneous malignancy, after basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves converting a photosensitizer to reactive oxygen intermediates, which preferentially bind to hyperproliferative tissue. The most commonly used photosensitizers are methyl aminolevulinate and aminolevulinic acid (ALA). Presently, ALA-PDT is approved in the US and Canada for the treatment of actinic keratoses on the face, scalp, and upper extremities. AIMS: This cohort study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of aminolevulinic acid, pulsed dye laser, and photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDL-PDT) for treatment of facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (isSCC). METHODS: Twenty adult patients with biopsy-confirmed isSCC on the face were recruited. Only lesions 0.4-1.3 cm in diameter were included. Patients underwent two treatments with ALA-PDL-PDT spaced 30 days apart. The isSCC lesion was then excised 4-6 weeks following the second treatment for histopathological assessment. RESULTS: No residual isSCC was detected in 17/20 (85%) patients. Two of the patients with residual isSCC had skip lesions present that explained the treatment failure. Excluding the patients with skip lesions, the posttreatment histological clearance rate was 17/18 (94%). Minimal side effects were reported. LIMITATIONS: Our study was limited by small sample size and lack of long-term recurrence data. CONCLUSIONS: The ALA-PDL-PDT protocol is a safe and well-tolerated treatment option for isSCC on the face, providing excellent cosmetic and functional results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".