Bibliographic record
Abstract
ALEXY, Robert. The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism. [B. L. Paulson and S. L. Paulson: Begriff und Geltung des Rechts]. Oxford: Clardeon Press, 2002. BEAUCHAMP, Tom L., CHILDRESS, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. BECKENKAMP, Joãosinho. Direito como exterioridade na legislação prática em Kant. Ethic@. V. 2, n. 2, 2003. p. 151-171. [http://www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@]. BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch. 1962. BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, promulgada em 05.10.1988. BRASIL. Decreto-Lei 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal. BRASIL. Lei 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. Institui o Código Civil. BRASIL. Lei 5.869, de 11 de janeiro de 1973. Código de processo civil. BRÜSEKE, Franz Josef. A modernidade técnica. In LEIS, Héctor Ricardo, SCHERERWARREN, Ilse, COSTA, Sérgio [orgs.]. Modernidade crítica e modernidade acrítica. Florianópolis: Cidade Futura, 2001. [adendo]. CODIGNOLA, Maria Moneti. From Generation to Production: How the Meaning of “Coming to the World” Changes in the Era of Reproductive Techniques. ethic@. Florianópolis, v.3, n.2, 2004. p. 99-106. COSTA, Sérgio [orgs.]. Modernidade crítica e modernidade acrítica. Florianópolis: Cidade Futura, 2001. p. 177-198. DUTRA, Delamar José Volpato. Dominação da natureza e dominação do homem: verso e anverso do iluminismo. In LEIS, Héctor Ricardo, SCHERER-WARREN, Ilse, DWORKIN, Ronald. Freedom's Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press, 1996. DWORKIN, Ronald. Life’s Dominion. An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. DWORKIN, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. ELY, John Hart. The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade. Yale LawJournal. V. 82, 1973. p. 920-949. GUYER, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. GUYER, Paul. Kant’s Deduction of the Principles of Right. In TIMMONS, Mark [ed.]. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: interpretative essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. p. 23-64. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2001. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre faticidade e validade. [v. I]. [Trad. F. B. Siebeneichler: Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats]. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991. HECK, José N. Direito subjetivo e dever jurídico interno em Kant. Texto inédito. HOLMES, Oliver Wendel. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review. V. X, n. 8, 1897. p. 457-478. HRUSCHKA, Joachim. The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant’s “Metaphysics of Morals”. Law and Philosophy. V. 23, 2004. p. 45–72. LOCKE, John. Carta acerca da tolerância. [1689]. [Trad. A. Aiex: Epistola de tolerantia]. 2. ed. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1978. MacINTYRE, Alasdair. Whose justice? Which rationality? London: Duckworth,1988. MUNZER, Stephen Rawls. Kant and Property Rights in Body Parts. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. V. VI, n. 2, 1993. p. 319-41. RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. [Revised Edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. [First ed. 1971]. RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".