MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Does Ipv Boost Intestinal Immunity Among Children Under Five Years of Age? An Experience From Pakistan

2023· preprint· en· W4382198766 on OpenAlexaff
Atif Habib, Sajid Soofi, Imtiaz Hussain, Imran Ahmed, Z. Hussain, Tahir Rehman, Saeed Anwar, Simon Cousens, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliomyelitisMedicinePoliovirusImmunityPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialPoliomyelitis eradicationPediatricsImmunologyInternal medicineNursingImmune systemVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The OPV is the vaccine of choice in polio eradication, especially in developing countries, as it has eliminated the wild poliovirus type 2. However, the immunity induced by IPV is better than that induced by the OPV. The present study compared the mucosal and humoral response to poliovirus vaccines administered to previously OPV-immunized children to assess the immunity gap in children at-risk of high poliovirus transmission. This was a community-based three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2013 to May 2014 in healthy children under five years of age living in three high-risk districts of Pakistan, i.e., Karachi, Kashmore, and Bajaur. 387 clusters were randomized (131 to arm A, 127 to arm B, and 129 to arm C); however, 360 remained in the trial until the end (116 in arm A, 122 in arm B, and 122 in arm C). These clusters were randomly allocated using a computer algorithm to receive routine polio program (bOPV) activities (control, arm A), additional interventions with community mobilization and provision of short-term preventive maternal and child health services and routine immunization, including bOPV via health camps, (arm B), or all interventions of arm B with an additional provision of IPV (arm C ~ bOPV and IPV). Blood and stool samples were collected from a sub-sample to estimate humoral and intestinal immunity. Study findings showed that the serum titers were highest in Group C (IPV+OPV) at the baseline for P1, where its increase over time was also more prominent. Titers for P2 and P3 were statistically significantly higher amongst those who had received a routine OPV dose versus those who had not; this was true for all study groups and visits. In populations with high Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) failure rates, administering an Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) booster after a minimum of two OPV doses may effectively bridge immunity gaps. The IPV alone offers limited benefits to humoral immunity and doesn't provide intestinal immunity to prevent the infection and propagation of live poliovirus among unexposed populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207