Bibliographic record
Abstract
the Gap: 3rd place B etween 14.8% and 18% of all youths in North America have a chronic health condition, with up to 98% of those expected to reach the age of 20. 1 Despite this fact, most sites in Canada do not possess the appropriate resources, supports, and educational opportunities required to support chronic disease patients transitioning from pediatric to adult care. 2 Transition is defined as "the purposeful, planned movement of adolescents and young adults with chronic physical and mental conditions from child-centred to adult-oriented healthcare systems". 3While 'transfer' of care refers to a single point in time, 'transition' spans the length of time preceding and following the actual transfer. 2The key goals for a successful transition are to optimize health outcomes, increase adolescent involvement in their own care, and provide uninterrupted healthcare to the patient. 2,4The adolescent period involves the development of cognition, social groups, and sexuality that already poses several challenges.The addition of chronic disease management makes adolescence an especially sensitive period for this patient population that necessitates the need for a comprehensive clinical
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".