Job Conscientiousness and Professional Work Autonomy among Nurses at Zagazig University Hospitals الضمير الوظيفي والاستقلالية المهنية في العمل بين الممرضات بمستشفيات جامعة الزقازيق
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Job conscientiousness for nurses is a critical element in assuring patient safety and quality of nursing care, effectiveness of nursing performance and reducing of missed nursing care. Improved nurse autonomy is regarded as an essential element of nursing development. Aim of the study was to determine the relation between job conscientiousness, and Professional work autonomy among nurses. Design: The study used a descriptive correlational research design. Setting: Current study setting was New Surgical at Zagazig University Hospitals. Sample: A Convenience sample was used with a total number of nurse's sample size (265 n). Tools: That used for data collection were; 1- Six Factor personality questionnaire and 2- The global work autonomy scale (GWA). Results: The majorities of nurses had high professional work autonomy (82%) and (67.9%) percentages of the nurses with ''high'' agreement on Job conscientiousness., A significant difference between total professional work autonomy and personal characteristics (position, age, place of work, educational level, and nursing experience), While a significant difference between total job conscientiousness and personal characteristics (age, nursing experience) were found. Conclusion: Strong positive significant correlation was found between job conscientiousness and professional work autonomy among nurses. Recommendations: That the need to provide quality patient care through nurse and creating a working atmosphere which gives meaning to work that will guarantee worker job autonomy and task identify. Encourage junior staff nurses to exercise more autonomy in their everyday work by providing them with constructive criticism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".