Bibliographic record
Abstract
Questo contributo descrive i repertori linguistici degli italiani migrati stanziati a Toronto (Canada) e a Londra (Regno Unito); propone di mostrare la loro evoluzione nel corso delle diverse ondate migratorie, in modo da individuare somiglianze e divergenze tra i flussi degli anni Cinquanta e Sessanta e le migrazioni contemporanee. In tale prospettiva, obiettivo ultimo del contributo è evidenziare la criticità della nozione di heritage langauge così come applicata allo studio delle comunità italiane nel mondo e di suggerire modelli di lettura alternativi basati al concetto di repertorio linguistico.
 
 Parallelisms and discontinuities in two anglophone contexts
 This paper focuses on the linguistic repertoires of Italian migrants settled in two different cities, that are Toronto (in Canada) and London (in the UK). It aims to show their evolution during the various migratory waves and to identify similarities and differences between the flows that took place in the Fifties and in the Sixties and those that started after the recent crisis. The ultimate goal of the paper is to highlight the critical points of the heritage language approach as applied to the study of Italian communities worldwide: the paper aims of discuss alternative approaches based on the notion of linguistic multiple repertoire that has been recently proposed by several authors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".