MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382316754 · doi:10.3390/pr11051434

Fabrication of Strong Self-Reinforced Polyethylene Terephthalate Composites through the In Situ Nanofibrillation Technology

2023· article· en· W4382316754 on OpenAlex
Eric S. Kim, Patrick Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcesses · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialPolyethylene terephthalateComposite numberUltimate tensile strengthFabrication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fabrication of self-reinforced polyethylene terephthalate (PET) has been achieved through the in situ generation of PET fibrils via a spun bond process. The reinforcement fibrils created from the PET with higher Tm are made from a unique in situ processing method. As a result, the fibrils are well dispersed and distributed in the lower Tm PET matrix. The high degree of molecular similarity affords perfect interfaces between the matrix and dispersed phase, leading to excellent stress transfer from the matrix to the dispersed fibrils. While the extremely large interfaces from the nanofibrillation process can maximize the advantage of the excellent molecular similarity of the self-reinforced polymeric composites, few studies have been conducted to research nanofibrillar self-reinforced polymeric composite systems. Hence, as a proof of concept, this work provides new insight into an approach for developing a self-reinforced polymeric system with a nanofibrillation process. This process increases the tensile strength of PET composites by up to 15% compared to composites made by a simple blending process and 47% higher than neat PET. Furthermore, extensional viscosity measurements show a strain-hardening behavior in the fibrillated PET composites not observed in the neat PET and showed minimal behavior in un-fibrillated PET composites. The foam process results reveal that the presence of PET fibrils in PET improves the expansion ratio as well as the cell density of the PET composites. Specifically, compared to the PET composite foams without the fibrillation process, fibrillated PET composite foams showed up to 3.7 times higher expansion ratios and one to two orders of magnitude higher cell densities. In thermal conductivity measurements, fibrillated PET composite foams achieved thermal conductivity of as low as 0.032 W/mK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it