MetaZSCIL: A Meta-Learning Approach for Generalized Zero-Shot Class Incremental Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generalized zero-shot learning (GZSL) aims to recognize samples whose categories may not have been seen at training. Standard GZSL cannot handle dynamic addition of new seen and unseen classes. In order to address this limitation, some recent attempts have been made to develop continual GZSL methods. However, these methods require end-users to continuously collect and annotate numerous seen class samples, which is unrealistic and hampers the applicability in the real-world. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose a more practical and challenging setting named Generalized Zero-Shot Class Incremental Learning (CI-GZSL). Our setting aims to incrementally learn unseen classes without any training samples, while recognizing all classes previously encountered. We further propose a bi-level meta-learning based method called MetaZSCIL to directly optimize the network to learn how to incrementally learn. Specifically, we sample sequential tasks from seen classes during the offline training to simulate the incremental learning process. For each task, the model is learned using a meta-objective such that it is capable to perform fast adaptation without forgetting. Note that our optimization can be flexibly equipped with most existing generative methods to tackle CI-GZSL. This work introduces a feature generative framework that leverages visual feature distribution alignment to produce replayed samples of previously seen classes to reduce catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments conducted on five widely used benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".